The mesh sequences of k(Γ_A) on homogeneous paths #
Proposition 2.6(1)(2) transported to k(Γ_A) = C(Γ_A, c) through the
realization of Proposition 2.6(3) (graded-category.tex). For a
homogeneous family of morphisms of kQ the statements read, modulo the mesh
ideal:
- (
cov_homog) if∑_a G_a alies in the mesh ideal, then at a projective vertex everyG_adoes, and at a nonprojective vertexythere isHwithG_a ≡ c_{y,a} H (σa)for every arrowaending aty(the manuscript's "comes fromh ∈ C_{n-2}(W, τY)", as in the injectivity step of (3)); - (
cov_mono_homog) if everyH (σa)lies in the mesh ideal, so doesH; - (
contra_homog) if∑_a c_{y,a} (σa) V_alies in the mesh ideal, thenV_a ≡ a Ufor oneU; - (
contra_mono_homog) if everya Ulies in the mesh ideal, so doesU.
The first two use the first sequence of (1), the last two the second
sequence (LayerExactnessDual.lean).
Every arrow ending at Y is the arrow of a summand of the middle term.
A homogeneous element of the mesh ideal is realized one radical degree higher.
Proposition 2.6(1)(2) for k(Γ_A), covariant form on homogeneous
families.
Proposition 2.6(1) for k(Γ_A): the first map of a mesh is injective
on homogeneous families.
Proposition 2.6(1) for k(Γ_A), second sequence: precomposition with
the arrows into a nonprojective vertex is injective on homogeneous
morphisms.
Proposition 2.6(1) for k(Γ_A), second sequence, exactness on
homogeneous families: if ∑_a c_{y,a} (σa) V_a lies in the mesh ideal, then
V_a ≡ a U for one U.