Injective labels and essential surjectivity (Proposition 2.10) #
graded-category.tex: "Write S_x = P_x/rad P_x … Since
dim C(P_y, S_x) = dim Hom_A(P_y, S_x) = δ_{xy}, its evaluation is the simple
A₀-module S_x⁰. For the original injective I_x = D_k(Ae_x), put
N_x = ev(R_{I_x}). … full faithfulness gives
dim Hom_{A₀}(S_y⁰, N_x) = dim C(S_y, I_x) = δ_{xy}. Thus soc N_x = S_x⁰. Also
dim N_x e_y = dim C(P_y, I_x) = … = dim e_y A₀ e_x. Extend the inclusion of
soc N_x in D_k(A₀ e_x) to a map N_x → D_k(A₀ e_x). Its kernel is zero,
since every nonzero submodule meets the socle. Equality of dimensions then makes
it an isomorphism."
The labels S_x, I_x and the three dimension identities are the inputs
(InjData); they come from mod A through the graded Hom dimensions.
The local structure restricted to the projective labels.
Instances For
The simple and injective labels at the projective labels, with the Hom
dimensions of graded-category.tex.
Instances For
S_p⁰ = ev(S_p).
Instances For
N_p = ev(I_p).
Instances For
One-object families.
Instances For
R⁰_X ≅ ⊕_{Unit} R⁰_X.
Instances For
Maps between evaluations of labels are evaluations of morphisms.
ev(I_p) ≅ D(A₀ e_p) (graded-category.tex).
Evaluation is essentially surjective (Lemma 2.9 with Proposition 2.10):
every finite-dimensional A₀-module is the evaluation of a family of labels.