Lemma 2.5 in the opposite category #
graded-category.tex: "Applying these arguments to the opposite module
category proves exactness of the second sequence in (1) and the assertion at
injective labels." This file transfers the hypotheses of the abstract Lemma 2.5
(StrictLayers.strict) to Cᵒᵖ:
- the categorical radical and its powers are self-dual
(
isRadicalMorphism_op_iff,mem_Ipow_op_iff); - the Krull–Schmidt target normal form of
C(split epimorphism and radical map) is the source normal form ofCᵒᵖ(hasSplitRadicalNormalForm_op); - a left tau-sequence
Y → E → Twith epic second map is a right radical approximation ofYinCᵒᵖ(approxOfLeftTau).
The Krull–Schmidt target normal form: after an isomorphism of its target, every map is a column of a split epimorphism and a radical map.
Instances For
A biproduct decomposition in C gives one in Cᵒᵖ.
Instances For
The weak cokernel property of the second map of a short complex.
Instances For
A complex Y → E → T with the radical approximation property, whose epic
second map is a weak cokernel of the first (a left tau-sequence), is a right
radical approximation of Y in Cᵒᵖ: dually, every radical map out of Y
factors through f, and every map in I²(T, Z) is q ∘ g with q radical.