Lemma 10.2 for twice a cocycle of A⁽²⁾ (Proposition 10.3) #
integral-deformations.tex. For a Hochschild cocycle μ̄ of A⁽²⁾ of positive degree
q, the cocycle μ̃ = 2μ̄ of 𝒪P is a coboundary (exists_hcobdry_twice): the corrections of
the lifted modules and arrows are twice those of μ̄ (IntegralTransport); their mesh errors are
twice a family of degree q + 2 ≥ 3, a derivative by Lemma B.2 (two_smul_mem_imageD), so an
arrow change removes them; the projective corner of the lifted modules is 𝒪P
(corner_surj, corner_inj), and CornerDeriv.eq_hcobdry concludes.
This is the composite j = 0 and injectivity of Ψ₄ used in the proof of Proposition 10.3,
restricted to the classes i_*[μ̄], which is all that proof uses.
The lifted module of X.
Instances For
The evaluation of 𝒪Q on the lifted modules.
Instances For
The reduction of a lifted module.
Instances For
The image of a path combination in C(Q, c).
Instances For
Evaluation commutes with reduction.
Evaluation of the mesh category over 𝒪 #
The image of a path combination in C(Q, ũ).
Instances For
A preimage in 𝒪Q.
Instances For
The evaluation of C(Q, ũ) on the lifted modules.
Instances For
The mesh derivative evaluates to the first-order mesh error of an arrow change.
Evaluation commutes with reduction, on C(Q, ũ).
The projective corner #
The vertex idempotent ẽ_s of 𝒪P.
Instances For
The generator w_s ∈ M̃_s.
Instances For
The regular corner ψ̃_s : M̃_s → ẽ_s𝒪P.
Instances For
Yoneda at projective labels #
Bijectivity of the corner evaluation #
The corner evaluation is surjective.
The corner evaluation is injective modulo the mesh ideal.
Lemma 10.2 for twice a cocycle #
The lifted actions over 𝒪, twice those of μ.
Instances For
The arrow corrections: twice those of μ, changed by the evaluation of f.
Instances For
The first-order mesh errors vanish once f removes twice the mesh errors of μ.
Lemma 10.2 and Lemma B.2 for twice a cocycle (integral-deformations.tex):
for a cocycle μ of A⁽²⁾ of positive degree, the cocycle 2μ of 𝒪P is a coboundary.