Proposition 12.8: the polynomial mesh comparison #
deformation-refinements.tex (prop:polynomial-mesh-comparison): "Let m + Σ_{i∈I} t_i μ_i
be an associative family satisfying the hypotheses of Proposition 7.9 […], now indexed by
I = I₀. There are polynomial lifts of the normalized modules, their morphisms, and their mesh
presentations for which the retained mesh coefficients are F_i(t) = a_i t_i, a_i ∈ k^*. After
every specialization to k, these modules exhaust the indecomposables of the fibre algebra."
polynomialMeshComparison, for the mesh category C of mesh data whose positive degrees are
radical (as for k(Γ_A), IndSkeleton.arHrad). Hypotheses: the family μ_i (FamHyp:
internal degrees q_i ≥ 1, normalized, m + Σ_i t_i μ_i associative for all t), of characters
χ_i for a mesh weight W, with coordinates χ_i ↦ e_i (part of an integer basis,
Proposition 7.5); retained rows R_i of length q_i + 2 and relative weight χ_i whose classes
span the cokernels of the mesh derivatives (CokerSpan); no μ_i is a coboundary (its class in
HH²(A₀)_{χ_i} is nonzero). Conclusions, for every t : I → k:
- the lifted actions on the evaluated modules and the lifted arrows are polynomial in
t; - the lifted arrows satisfy
r_x = Σ_i a_i t_i R_iwitha_i ≠ 0, and present the lifted category of the fibre: the realization ofkQis surjective, with kernel(𝔪^{N+1}, r_x − Σ_i a_i t_i R_i); - the lifted modules exhaust the indecomposable modules of the fibre algebra (Corollary 12.1).
Proposition 12.8 (polynomial mesh comparison).